Date: Tue, 8 Nov 94 04:30:08 PST From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu Precedence: List Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #252 To: tcp-group-digest TCP-Group Digest Tue, 8 Nov 94 Volume 94 : Issue 252 Today's Topics: 10Ghz links Part 15 spread spectrum stuff? smtp gateway and dns Send Replies or notes for publication to: . Subscription requests to . Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu. Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives". We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 1994 13:13:44 +1000 From: ccdrw@cc.newcastle.edu.au (Dave Walmsley) Subject: 10Ghz links I've had several replies interested in this so here's what I know. In the November issue of Amateur Radio Action (Australian mag) the column by John Day VK3ZJF says there are boards for the 10Ghz link as described in the AARL handbook available from : Fred A Reimers KF9GX FAR Circuits, 18N640 Field Ct, Dundee, Illinois 60118-9269 USA He also comments that you still have to make the 1st IF board "but trust me, that's easy". Also in the credits are Glen N6GN, Ron N8FOW, Bdale N3EUA, who I think are on this group so they probably have better information. And, sorry for the wasted bandwidth if they have already replied, I've been out of touch for a few days. Dave --=====================================================================-- Dave VK2XPX, sysop VK2RAP ccdrw@cc.newcastle.edu.au sysop@vk2rap.newcastle.edu.au vk2xpx@vk2xpx.ampr.org ========================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Nov 94 12:05 EST From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson) Subject: Part 15 spread spectrum stuff? As a non-amateur (both in that I want to do commercial things, and I don't have a ticket), I'm wondering if any amateurs have been doing any digital spread-spectrum stuff in the 900-928 Mhz band. Both companies doing that (Metricom and Tetherless Access) think they want to sell services, not products. I just want to buy radios, and use them to sell a local service. Not looking for answers, just looking for where *I* might look for answers. -- -russ http://www.crynwr.com/crynwr/nelson.html Crynwr Software | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | ask4 PGP key 11 Grant St. | +1 315 268 1925 (9201 FAX) | What is thee doing about it? Potsdam, NY 13676 | LPF member - ask me about the harm software patents do. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 7 Nov 94 09:59:51 GMT From: A.D.S.Benham@bnr.co.uk Subject: smtp gateway and dns Bill, KD5LU wrote: => Scenario: I route my mail to a smtp gateway that also happens to be my => domain name server. I just want my outgoing mail to go to the mail gateway => and let forward it on. However, when I send a note to another location, => the domain name server (it is connected to the internet) gives me back the => ip address and my smtp sender then makes connection (or tries) to the => recipient directly, which causes some problems. Is there a way I can => configure my station to NOT do this ? I know if I drop the name server => it works the way I want it to, but I hate to do that. Have you tried the mail hopper code which I wrote? As a quick advert, the mail routing function peeps at the IP routing table, and if there's a gateway defined for the route to the destination, then it sends the mail to that gateway. It improves radio-based SMTP mail enormously. The code is in current JNOS versions. Andrew Benham ---------------------------------------------------------------- A.D.S.Benham@bnr.co.uk BNR Europe Ltd, London Road, Harlow, Essex CM17 9NA +44 1279 402372 Fax: +44 1279 402885 Home: g8fsl@g8fsl.ampr.org [44.131.181.17] ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ End of TCP-Group Digest V94 #252 ******************************